Clinical Report: Making Practice Metrics Matter
Overview
At an AAO 2026 workshop, Alexandra Acabá Berrocal described performance-driven incentive plans as a way for small practices to connect routinely measured metrics with accountability and practice growth. She discussed productivity-based, quality-based, and hybrid models, and presented a roadmap for designing plans intended to motivate teams, improve accountability, support retention, and enable long-term growth.
Background
Small practices may lack an established model for continued growth, according to Berrocal’s account of her own practice experience. Her workshop focused on using performance-improvement programs to hold staff and physicians accountable. The session emphasized that practices should measure relevant metrics consistently and consider how to use them within incentive structures. Related guidance on practice metrics cautions against tracking measures that do not inform action.
Data Highlights
The source describes incentive-plan frameworks but provides no numerical results or trial data.
Key Findings
- Berrocal said her practice implemented a performance-improvement program to establish accountability for staff and physicians.
- The workshop covered productivity-based, quality-based, and hybrid incentive models.
- Berrocal emphasized consistent measurement and using metrics to inform performance plans, rather than stopping at measurement alone.
- The presented roadmap addressed practical frameworks and real-world metrics for building incentive plans.
- Berrocal said such plans can be designed to motivate teams, improve accountability, support retention, and contribute to long-term growth.
- A related article on metrics advises practices to ignore vanity measures that do not drive action, including total website visits and raw social media reach.
Clinical Implications
For small practices considering incentive plans, the workshop described aligning accountability with productivity and quality measures, with hybrid models also presented as an option. The source does not provide comparative outcome data or specify which model is most appropriate for a given practice.
Conclusion
Berrocal’s workshop presented performance-driven incentive plans as a practical framework for small practices seeking to connect consistent measurement with accountability and growth. The source highlights productivity, quality, and hybrid approaches without reporting quantified outcomes.
Related Resources & Content
- Alexandra Acabá Berrocal, Ophthalmology Management, 2026 — Making Practice Metrics Matter
- Optometric Management, 2025 — Metrics That Matter: What to Track (and What to Ignore)
- Roger P. Levin, DDS, Inside Dentistry, 2015 — Learn to Manage Better with Metrics
- Optometric Management — Use Metrics in Your Practice
- Explore MIPS Value Pathways (MVPs) - QPP
- HEDIS MY 2026: What’s New, What’s Changed, What’s Retired - NCQA
- Effect of UK Quality and Outcomes Framework pay-for-performance programme on quality of primary care: systematic review with quantitative synthesis | The BMJ
This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.







