Objective:
The AAO 2026 case-based session presented a systematic approach to identifying causes of poor visual quality and dissatisfaction after cataract surgery, including in patients with good Snellen acuity.
Approach:
- Ocular surface: Assess dry eye, meibomian gland dysfunction, epithelial basement membrane dystrophy, tear-film instability, and corneal staining; stabilize surface disease before further refractive or surgical intervention.
- Refraction and expectations: Evaluate residual sphere or cylinder, refractive target miss, anisometropia, monovision intolerance, spectacle dependence, and differences between the achieved result and patient expectations.
- IOL-related causes: Assess dysphotopsia, unwanted photic phenomena, lens tilt or decentration, and capsular factors. Discuss surgical options only after considering whether they are likely to improve symptoms.
Key Findings:
- Good Snellen acuity does not rule out substantial dissatisfaction or symptoms such as glare, halos, fluctuating vision, reduced contrast, and dysphotopsia.
- The panel recommended identifying the dominant cause through a consistent evaluation of ocular-surface, corneal, refractive, optical, and IOL-related factors.
- Patient expectations, including anticipated spectacle independence or near vision, may contribute to dissatisfaction.
Interpretation:
The session focused on evaluating postoperative dissatisfaction beyond Snellen acuity by systematically considering ocular-surface, corneal, refractive, optical, and IOL-related causes, as well as patient expectations.
Limitations:
- The context describes a case-based educational session, not a clinical study; it provides no patient-level outcome data or comparative evidence for the approaches discussed.
Conclusion:
The panel recommended identifying the dominant cause of postoperative dissatisfaction before considering further refractive or surgical intervention.
Sources:
This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.







