From womb to wound
Use of amniotic membrane to treat injuries is growing.
By Anny M.S. Cheng, MD and Scheffer C.G. Tseng, MD, PhD
Treatment of diverse ophthalmic diseases by amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) was first used more than 70 years ago. In 2005, U.S. law went into effect governing tissue-based products, and scientific and commercial interest in the membrane’s healing properties began to grow.1 Development of different methods of tissue preservation helped to spur interest as well.2
This article will discuss recent advances to aid in regeneration.
Mechanism of action
The amniotic membrane (AM) shares the same cell origin as the fetus. Anatomically, the AM is the innermost membrane enwrapping the fetus in the amniotic cavity and extends from the fetal membrane. Histologically, AM consists of a single epithelial layer, a thick basement membrane and an avascular stroma. These findings suggest that AM, like fetal tissue, might not only promote healing but also facilitate regeneration.3
Adult wound healing is heralded by marked inflammatory responses involving many inflammatory cellular infiltrations derived from innate and adaptive immune responses. This wound-healing process is characterized by inflammation (acute phase), granulation tissue formation (intermediate phase) and scarring (chronic phase). Nonresolving inflammation and other pathological states lead to excessive scarring or nonhealing wounds.
Clinical ophthalmic indications
Surgeons transplant AM as either a permanent surgical graft or a temporary biological bandage/patch (Tables 1 and 2). When used as a permanent graft, AM fills in the tissue defect so that host cells grow over or into the membrane, which will subsequently be integrated into the host tissue. This mode prevents scarring so as to restore tissue integrity and function, including vision. In this mode, AM can be used as a single layer or multiple layers that are secured to the host tissue either by sutures or with fibrin glue (Figure 1).4
CORNEAL SURFACE RECONSTRUCTION | |
• | Neurotrophic persistent epithelial defect with ulceration |
• | Sterile corneal stromal thinning, descemetocele and perforation |
• | Infectious keratitis and scleritis |
• | Band keratopathy, scar or tumor |
• | Partial limbal stem cell deficiency |
CONJUNCTIVAL SURFACE RECONSTRUCTION | |
• | Pterygium and pinguecula |
• | Fornix reconstruction |
• | Conjunctivochalasis |
• | Tumors |
IN CONJUNCTION WITH OTHER SURGERIES | |
• | Limbal conjunctival autograft for unilateral total limbal stem cell deficiency |
• | Keratolimbal allograft for bilateral total limbal stem cell deficiency |
• | Tenoplasty for scleral melt |
• | Strabismus |
• | Glaucoma (high-risk trabeculectomy, leaking blebs, tube exposure) |
DEFECT | • | Neurotrophic persistent epithelial defect without ulceration |
• | Keratoconjunctivitis sicca (Dry eye disease) | |
• | Corneal ulcer | |
• | Punctate keratitis | |
DYSTROPHY | • | Epithelial corneal dystrophy |
• | Recurrent corneal erosion | |
DEGENERATION | • | Band keratopathy |
• | Nodular degeneration | |
DAMAGE | • | Chemical/thermal burn |
• | Alkaline/acid burn | |
• | Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis | |
• | Limbal stem cell deficiency |
Figure 1. Preoperative (A, C) and postoperative (B, D) of representative patients with AMT and sealing the gap in primary (A, B) and recurrent (C, D) pterygium, respectively. The caruncle morphology is restored after surgery and motility restriction is also corrected.
AM can also be used as a temporary biological bandage/patch (Figure 2) to suppress acute or chronic host tissue inflammation so as to promote healing with minimal scarring. Occasionally, a patch and a graft are used together — the patch acts as a protective shield to ensure epithelialization of the AM graft.5, 6 The sutureless approach:
• Shortens the surgical time
• Permits topical anesthesia
• Eliminates suture-induced inflammation.
Figure 2. AM as patch graft with suture.
More importantly, this approach facilitates easy-access patient care by immediately delivering AM’s biological actions without delay. As a result, the in-tandem usage could radically change outcomes that require acute intervention, like chemical burns as well as Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis.
Corneal surface reconstruction
When used as a graft (single layer or multiple layers), AM restores stroma loss and promotes the healing of persistent corneal ulcers including neurotrophic keratopathy, corneal stromal thinning and descemetocele. Compared to the conventional surgical treatments including lamellar/full-thickness corneal transplantation, tarsorrhaphy and conjunctival flap, AMT offers the advantage of avoiding potential allograft rejection and postoperative astigmatism of tectonic corneal grafts.4,7
If the patient requires corneal transplantation, concomitant AMT can improve the success rate by reducing inflammation. Corneal perforations from 0.5 to 5 mm treated by AMT with or without additional tissue adhesive are reported to achieve high success rates as well.4,7
Severe bacterial keratitis requires immediate treatment with intensive topical broad-spectrum antibiotics, which are potentially toxic to the corneal epithelium and contribute to a prolonged corneal epithelial defect. AM soaked with antibiotics prolongs the bactericidal effect, counterbalances the epithelial toxicity and exerts as-yet unclear antimicrobial effect. For patients with symptomatic bullous keratopathy caused by corneal endothelial decompensation, AMT can ameliorate pain, prevent recurrent erosion and microbial superinfection. Considering its approach, AM is likely more desirable than conjunctival flaps or tarsorrhaphy as it preserves a cosmetically more acceptable appearance.
For eyes with partial limbal stem cell deficiency, the remaining limbal epithelial stem cells can be expanded by AMT following conjunctivalized epithelium debridement to reconstruct corneal surface. For eyes inflicted with total LSCD, the transplantation of limbal epithelial stem cells is required. AM’s therapeutic abilities to restore a healthy limbal stromal niche also help with the success of transplanted autologous or allogeneic limbal grafts.4,7
PERMANENT GRAFT
Conjunctival surface reconstruction
The integrated AM can be a part of the ocular surface or a tissue plane underneath (Tenon substitute in tenoplasty, muscle sheath substitute in strabismus surgery, scleral flap of a trabeculectomy). AM can facilitate healing with less inflammation and minimal scarring compared to conjunctival graft following removal of large conjunctival lesions such as tumors. Suppression of postsurgical inflammation with AMT along with sealing the gap between the resected conjunctiva and the remaining Tenon capsule after fibrovascular excision helps to avoid pterygium recurrence (Figure 2).8 Also, AM can help reconstruct bulbar conjunctiva and fornix following lysis of symblepharon or conjunctivochalasis.4,7
Biological bandage
Self-retained AM has been successfully used in conditions including refractory ulcerative keratitis, neurotrophic keratitis, recurrent epithelial erosion, high-risk corneal grafts, acute chemical and thermal burns, acute Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis, necrotizing scleritis, and partial or total limbal stem cell deficiency.4,9 A recent study suggested another: refractory dry eye disease (DED)(Figure 3).10 AM is rich in nerve growth factor which helps treat DED by reducing inflammation and may facilitate the return of corneal nerves.11,12
However, self-retained AM also works as a magnet to attract inflammatory cells from the ocular surface. Repeated use of self-retained AM can facilitate the speed of reducing inflammation.
Persistent epithelial defect (PED) is usually neurotrophic, which disrupts the neural reflexes that control tear secretion and blinking, resulting in a severe form of dry eye, epithelial breakdown and poor healing. Conventional treatments usually fail to promote healing and tend to leave a corneal scar. If the epithelial defect has minimal or no stromal loss, AM can be used as a biological bandage — its active wound healing components and nerve growth factor facilitate epithelial healing and help recover corneal sensitivity.4 AM is expected to stay in place for two weeks for epithelization to occur. If the AM dissolves before this period during which PED shows minimal improvement, it may indicate the presence of ocular surface exposure because of infrequent lid blinking and/or incomplete lid closure. Self-retained AM also facilitates adequate blinking because of the polycarbonate ring that stimulates blinking.10 This likelihood also explains why placement of self-retained AM facilitates the ocular surface recovery in DED not only in the treated eye but also in the untreated fellow eye.
To freeze ....
By Anny M.S. Cheng, MD and Scheffer C.G. Tseng, MD, PhD
The PROKERA (Bio-Tissue, Inc.) is a self-retained amniotic membrane that covers the corneal surface without sutures. Upon healing, AM usually dissolves or is removed in the practitioner’s office.13 It obtained 510(k) clearance in 2003.
Our lab has continued to work on discerning AM’s healing properties.
We have found that water-soluble HC-HA/PTX3 complex purified from cryopreserved AM is a key component responsible for its efficacy.14 Uniquely, the broad anti-inflammatory action of the HC-HA/PTX3 targets inflammatory cells extending to innate and adaptive immune responses, which play a major role in allogeneic rejection and autoimmune dysregulation.15 In addition, HC-HA/PTX3 mediates a direct anti-scarring effect on ocular tissue fibroblasts. It suppresses TGF-β signaling in preventing scar formation and maintaining the normal keratocyte phenotype.14 Furthermore, HC-HA/PTX3 dose-dependently suppress viability and tube formation of angiogenetic endothelial cells to yield an anti-angiogenic effect.16
Besides exerting these effects, HC-HA/PTX3 also distinctively maintains limbal niche cells to support the quiescence of limbal epithelial stem cells.17 These findings explain why AM helps restore a healthy limbal stromal niche to assist in vivo or ex vivo expansion of limbal epithelial stem cells toward regeneration. The clinical efficacy of AMT is likely influenced by the different methods of processing and preserving AM. A recent paper showed that this active component, i.e., HC-HA/PTX3, is lost when AM is processed into a dry membrane.18
Specifically, the water-soluble HC-HA/PTX3 complex purified from cryopreserved AM for suppressing inflammation, scarring and angiogenesis indicates that a unique fetal strategy might have been built into AM to curtail immunity and gear up the wound-healing toward regeneration.
Recurrent corneal erosion, common in corneal dystrophies such as epithelial basement membrane dystrophy and granular dystrophy, is typified by defective basement membrane (BM) adhesions and recurrent epithelium breakdown. Conventional treatments have high recurrence rates and carry the risk of developing haze. AM, however, contains inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases that prevent degradation of the basement membrane. Furthermore, AM also contains an active matrix component (see To Freeze, page 44)) that is essential for reducing inflammation and scarring and for promoting regenerative healing.
.... Or dehydrate?
By Jonathan Schell, MD
With the identification and characterization of an HC-HA/PTX3 complex, Tseng et al. believe they have found what allows amniotic membrane to produce its healing effects.19-21 It is proposed that this complex remains after cryopreservation, but is lost during dehydration.22 The cited study compared cryopreserved AM (CTAM, for Cryo Tek) to dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane (dHACM), the equivalent of Ambio5 rather than Ambio2.22 It is unclear if the results are generalizable to the more clinically utilized Ambio2 line of products including the AmbioDiskTM (IOP Ophthalmics/Katena).
Despite the chorion containing very little hyaluronic acid (HA) there was no statistically significant difference in the ratio of HA/total protein when comparing CTAM to dHACM. While HA was abundant in all tissues tested, the study found that the HA present in dHACM appeared to be low molecular weight (LMW) as defined as <500 kDA. However, casual observation appears to show some degree of staining at molecular weights higher than this (Fig. 4, lane 5). How dehydration may destroy a high molecular weight (HMW) form of HA while sparing a LMW form is not proposed. A band noted in the well of CTAM (Fig. 5, lane 5) is thought “most likely” HC-HA. Its absence in the well of dHACM (Fig. 5, lane 9) despite clear evidence of the presence of HC in dHACM (Fig. 5, lane 9) is presented as further evidence of a lack of HMW HA. Next, PTX3 is defined as an oligomeric protein whose role is to stabilize the HC-HA complex. The dHACM sample was found to be “devoid” of this protein. Again, the presence of an immunoreactive protein band in dHACM with a weight around 90 kDA (PTX3 dimer) can be seen; it appears similar to the PTX3 control (Fig. 6, lane 9 vs. 4).
The study concludes with the investigation of the role of AM on effectors of inflammation via cells (activated macrophages) and cytokines (IL-10 which is anti-inflammatory and IL-12 which is pro-inflammatory). While CTAM did show enhanced ability to inhibit proliferation of activated macrophages, there was no difference seen in either CTAM or dHACM with regard to being able to promote macrophage apoptosis relative to the control. Also, no significant difference was seen between CTAM and dHACM with regard to IL-10 levels and both did show statistically significant reductions in IL-12 relative to the control (Fig. 8b).
The authors rightfully conclude that additional study is needed to see if the differences presented would extend to other tissues with similar processing techniques (e.g., Ambio2TM). More important is the recognition that additional experiments should include an analysis of a larger panel of cytokines. Indeed, AM is a complex structure, with PURION processed (MiMedx Group, Inc. Marietta, Ga.) Ambio2TM showing additional anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-4 and TGF-β1), growth factors (EGF, PDGF and PLGF), and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs-1,2, AND 4) among other vital components.23
In conclusion, Tseng at al. should be commended for continuing to highlight the importance of AM while striving to provide further insight into this complex structure. The ophthalmic community would benefit from further research and corroboration.
Conclusion
Use of AM is safe and effective for ocular surface reconstruction, with a very low infection rate. Ophthalmologists have found additional ocular tissue sites on which they can use AMT as a treatment; so too have other specialists found AMT useful in their clinical and surgical practices.1 OM
EDITOR’S NOTE: Dusko Ilic, MD, PhD, and colleagues wrote a review about human amniotic membrane in the Jan. 12 issue of the British Medical Bulletin. In an e-mail, he commented on the efficacy of both types of amniotic membrane preservation. “There are published reports on successful treatment using cryopreserved as well as dehydrated HAM. ... Dehydrated might be less potent, though it is more practical [and cheaper] for distribution and storage. We will probably have both options for a while.” Dr. Ilic is a reader in stem cell science at Kings College, London.
This article was supported in part by an unrestricted grant from Ocular Surface Research Education Foundation, Miami, Fla.
Dr. Schell reports he spoke on behalf of Katena at AAO 2015.
REFERENCES
1. Ilic d, Vicovac L, Nikolic M, Lazic Ilic E. Human amniotic membrane grafts in therapy of chronic non-healing wounds. British Medical Bulletin: 2016;1-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26764358
2. Meller D, Pauklin M, Thomasen H, et al. Amniotic membrane transplantation in the human eye. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011;108:243-248.
3. Tseng SC, He H, Zhang S, Chen SY. Niche regulation of limbal epithelial stem cells relationship between inflammation and regeneration. Ocul Surf. 2016 [Epub ahead of print].
4. Liu J, Sheha H, Fu Y, Liang L, Tseng SC. Update on amniotic membrane transplantation. Expert Rev Ophthalmol. 2010;5:645-661.
5. Kheirkhah A, Casas V, Raju VK, Tseng SC. Sutureless amniotic membrane transplantation for partial limbal stem cell deficiency. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145:787-794.
6. Liang L, Sheha H, Li J, Tseng SC. Limbal stem cell transplantation: new progresses and challenges. Eye (Lond). 2009;23:1946-1953.
7. Tseng SC. Amniotic membrane transplantation for ocular surface reconstruction. Biosci Rep. 2001;21:481-489.
8. Liu J, Fu Y, Xu Y, Tseng SC. New grading system to improve the surgical outcome of multirecurrent pterygia. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130:39-49.
9. Sheha H, Tighe S, Cheng AM, Tseng SC. Amniotic Membrane Transplantation. Expert Techniques in Ophthalmic Surg. 2015:167-175.
10. Cheng AM, Zhao D, Chen R, et al. Accelerated Restoration of Ocular Surface Health in Dry Eye Disease by Self-Retained Cryopreserved Amniotic Membrane. Ocul Surf. 2016;14:56-63.
11. Labbe A, Liang Q, Wang Z, et al. Corneal nerve structure and function in patients with non-sjogren dry eye: clinical correlations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:5144-5150.
12. Touhami A, Grueterich M, Tseng SC. The role of NGF signaling in human limbal epithelium expanded by amniotic membrane culture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:987-994.
13. Liu J, Sheha H, Fu Y, Liang L, Tseng SC. Update on amniotic membrane transplantation. Expert Rev Ophthalmol. 2010;5:645-661.
14. He H, Li W, Tseng DY, et al. Biochemical characterization and function of complexes formed by hyaluronan and the heavy chains of inter-alpha-inhibitor (HC*HA) purified from extracts of human amniotic membrane. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:20136-2046.
15. He H, Tan Y, Duffort S, Perez VL, Tseng SC. In vivo downregulation of innate and adaptive immune responses in corneal allograft rejection by HC-HA/PTX3 complex purified from amniotic membrane. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55:1647-56.
16. Shay E, He H, Sakurai S, Tseng SC. Inhibition of angiogenesis by HC.HA, a complex of hyaluronan and the heavy chain of inter-alpha-inhibitor, purified from human amniotic membrane. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:2669-2678.
17. Chen SY, Han B, Zhu YT, et al. HC-HA/PTX3 Purified from Amniotic Membrane Promotes BMP Signaling in Limbal Niche Cells to Maintain Quiescence of Limbal Epithelial Progenitor/Stem Cells. Stem Cells. 2015; 33:3341-55
18. Cooke M, Tan EK, Mandrycky C, He H, O’Connell J, Tseng SC. Comparison of cryopreserved amniotic membrane and umbilical cord tissue with dehydrated amniotic membrane/chorion tissue. J Wound Care. 2014;23:465-476.
19. He H, Li W, Tseng DY, et al. Biochemical characterization and function of complexes formed by hyaluronan and the heavy chains of inter-alpha-inhibitor (HC-HA) purified from extracts of human amniotic membrane. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:20136–20146.
20. Zhang S, He H, Day AJ, et al. Constitutive expression of inter-alpha-inhibitor family proteins and tumor necrosis factor-stimulated gene-6 by human amniotic membrane epithelial and stromal cells supporting formation of the heavy chain-hyaluronan (HC-HA) complex. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:12433–12444.
21. He H, Zhang S, Tighe S, et al. Immobilized heavy chain-hyaluronic acid polarizes lipopolysaccharide-activated macrophages toward M2 phenotype. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:25792–25803.
22. Cooke M, Tan EK, Mandrycky C, et al. Comparison of cryopreserved amniotic membrane and umbilical cord tissue with dehydrated amniotic membrane/chorion tissue. J Wound Care. 2014;23:465-744.
23. Koob TJ, Lim JJ, Zabek N, et. al. Cytokines in single layer amnion allografts compared to multilayer amnion/chorion allografts for wound healing. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2015;103:1133-1140.
About the Authors | |
Anny M.S. Cheng, MD, served as the director of the ophthalmology department at the National Taiwan University Hospital, Yunlin branch from 2007-2013. Since 2014 she has been the associate clinician scientist at the Ocular Surface Center, Miami, and participates in product development and clinical trials for TissueTech, Inc. | |
Scheffer C.G. Tseng, MD, PhD cofounded Bio-Tissue, Inc. in 1997 and serves as the chairman and chief scientific officer of TissueTech, Inc. He served as chair professor at Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine, until 2002. His research focus during the last 12 years has been to identify the active biological components of human amniotic membrane, to develop alternative products in delivering the efficacies of its natural healing properties and to expand the benefits of its clinical applications. Contact him at: stseng@ocularsurface.com | |
Financial disclosure: Dr. Tseng is the founder and a major shareholder of TissueTech, Inc., which holds patents on the methods of preservation and clinical uses of amniotic membrane graft and ProKera. |